For Reviewers

We value the time and expertise of our reviewers. Your careful evaluation ensures the scientific quality and integrity of the Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries Research (BJFR).

Timely Review

Complete assessments within the agreed timeline to support efficient editorial decisions.

Constructive Feedback

Provide clear, evidence-based comments that help authors improve scientific quality.

Confidentiality

Treat manuscripts as confidential documents and never share unpublished content.

Ethical Standards

Uphold COPE-aligned integrity, declare conflicts, and report ethical concerns promptly.

Reviewer Responsibilities

  • Treat manuscripts as confidential and do not share unpublished material.
  • Provide objective, evidence-based assessments of scientific merit.
  • Identify relevant literature that should be cited where appropriate.
  • Report suspected ethical issues, including plagiarism or data concerns.
  • Declare any actual or potential conflicts of interest promptly.
  • Submit reviews within the agreed timeline or request an extension early.

Reviewer Eligibility

  • Demonstrated expertise relevant to the manuscript subject area.
  • Active research experience in fisheries, aquaculture, or related fields.
  • A record of scholarly publication or equivalent professional expertise.
  • Ability to provide constructive, independent peer review.

Review Criteria

  • Originality and novelty of the research question
  • Scientific quality and clarity of presentation
  • Appropriateness of study design and methodology
  • Data quality, analysis, and reproducibility
  • Interpretation of results and conclusions
  • Adequacy and relevance of citations
  • Overall contribution to the field

Reviewer Ethics

  • Maintain strict confidentiality throughout the peer-review process.
  • Avoid personal criticism; focus comments on the work itself.
  • Declare conflicts of interest and decline invitations when appropriate.
  • Respect publication ethics and COPE-aligned journal standards.

Review Timeline

BJFR aims to provide authors with timely decisions while allowing reviewers sufficient time for a thorough evaluation.

5 Days

Invitation Response

15 Days

Average Review Completion

Editorial Decisions

Reviewers may recommend one of the following outcomes to support the editorial decision:

  • Accept
  • Minor Revision
  • Major Revision
  • Reject

Reviewer Recognition

BJFR acknowledges reviewer contributions through recognition aligned with established journal practice:

  • Certificate of Reviewing
  • Annual Reviewer Recognition
  • Editorial Board Consideration
  • Publons / Web of Science Recognition (if applicable)
  • Reviewer Board listing

Why Review for BJFR?

Peer review for BJFR supports rigorous scholarship in fisheries and aquatic sciences while strengthening the global research community.

  • Contribute to high-quality, peer-reviewed research that informs sustainable fisheries and aquaculture.
  • Engage with current methods, datasets, and emerging questions in your specialist area.
  • Receive professional acknowledgement for completed reviews and related recognition pathways.
  • Support an open-access journal committed to ethical publishing and editorial integrity.
  • Help authors improve clarity, reproducibility, and scientific contribution through constructive feedback.

Become a Reviewer

Statistics

Active Reviewers

1+

Countries Represented

1

Reviews Completed

10+

Average Review Time

15 Days